At my university I have new interesting project about Spiritual Intelligence (SQ).
If you never heard about this topic there are some basic information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritual_intelligence

I'm setting this topic because I'm searching for some texts about SQ. Of course in English and in electronic form. Some of you may found it before by accident and if you did so please let me know. I'd be grateful for any help. It'd be hard to share effects of my work because they'll be in polish, but I can write some quick sum up in exchange for your help.

I'm also open for any forms of discussion

Interesting Idea.

For years I've seen very skilled Meta-s being discounted because there are so many fakers out there. If there were a way to measure and certify something like SQ, it would help less skilled Meta-s and normal folks know who to trust.

It seems to me that the medical field (at least in the US) was prone to many charlatans 100 or so years ago. A group of medical people got together and formed an association to rate the skill of medical practitioners. Today in the US, no one can claim to be a medical doctor without their approval.

At some point I'd like to see a similar group for the Meta- community. Imagine if you had to be rated at a certain level in SQ by a group of skilled and certified Meta-s before you could call yourself a psychic or spiritual healer or whatever.

Angel wrote:At some point I'd like to see a similar group for the Meta- community. Imagine if you had to be rated at a certain level in SQ by a group of skilled and certified Meta-s before you could call yourself a psychic or spiritual healer or whatever.

Before it may happen there have to be grate change in academical/science environment. Right now even SQ is hard to accept and It's cold pseudo-scientific. Maybe it's because not enough people had written about issue, or they are prohibited in some way to do so. As usual to introduce new controversial idea previous generation has to die off.
What's more till now I hadn't found any objective form of measure SQ, all presented one's were extremely subjective. Finding way of factual measurin SQ is of course another possible way of developement idea. It may happen or not.
Who can change it? Sociologists. Future sociologists. People like me O.o

There is always a lot things to do